Corrections Policy

This page explains how DailyTech.ai handles errors in published articles.

Our approach

When an article is wrong, we fix it. We do not silently delete an article to make an
error disappear, and we do not leave an unsupported claim standing because removing it
is inconvenient.

What counts as a correction

• Factual error: a statement that is untrue, or a number, date,
  name, or attribution that is wrong.
• Unsupported claim: a statement presented as established fact that
  the cited sources do not actually support.
• Citation defect: a source that does not support the claim attached
  to it, is misattributed, or does not resolve.
• Missing context: framing that is technically accurate but leaves a
  materially misleading impression.

What we do

Depending on severity, we correct the specific statement, narrow a claim to what the
evidence supports, remove an unsupported passage, or unpublish an article while it is
reworked. Substantive corrections are reflected in the article’s visible update stamp.
Where a correction changes the meaning of an article, the change is described rather
than made invisibly.

Content that has been withdrawn

Where a review has found that an article contains claims we cannot support, that
article is removed from public view pending correction rather than left published. This
has been applied to previously published articles on this site.

Reporting an error

Please report suspected errors through our
contact page. Reports that identify the
specific claim and, where possible, a source are the fastest to act on. We do not
promise a response time here, because that is a commitment we are not in a position to
guarantee.

Corrections and our quality gate

Articles going through our editorial review must clear a fixed 90/100 rubric with no
unresolved high-severity issues, assessed independently of the editing pass. A factual
or citation problem is treated as blocking: the article does not publish until it is
resolved.